Nickname: RRWPC954
Author feed: admin RSS Feed

Latest entries

Sonoma County Gazette, August 2013

NOTE: The meeting referenced below has been changed to November 22, 2013.

Down the Drain:  ‘Treated Sewage’ or ‘Recycled Water’? Words have the power to conjure up all kinds of feelings for good or ill, such as “treated sewage” or “recycled water”.  Most people would never dream that these disparate terms represent the same product.

Over the years, there has been this subtle and intentional shift in language  to persuade the public to accept exposures to treated wastewater in everyday life.  After all, it looks and smells the same as potable, and even experts can’t tell the difference.  Some officials and politicians have even tasted the local chemical concoction to certify it’s high quality.  Over the years, what used to be ‘treated sewage’ became ‘treated effluent’, then ‘wastewater’ or ‘treated wastewater’, and finally ‘recycled water’, this latter having entirely removed the ‘yuk!’ factor.  Yet little has changed in the content of the product.

Current treatment of the raw sewage is better than it used to be, and probably the term ‘treated sewage’ is no longer fair,  but ‘recycled water’ is very misleading, since of the approximately 80,000 chemicals on the market, only 125 are regulated.  We have a long way to go before we should agree to drink the stuff.  What we are learning about endocrine disrupting chemicals (most pesticides are in that category, for example) is that children are more vulnerable than adults and low dose exposures can have major impacts on the elderly or those with compromised immune systems.

The State Water Board long ago decided to ease water shortages by promoting the widespread reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation.  Locally, this promotion translated into about 2.3 billion gallons of Santa Rosa’s treated wastewater discharged onto our Laguna watershed, mostly in summer time.  This represents about a third of all Santa Rosa’s wastewater generated.  The intention of course, was to keep all the water on the land and allow it to be taken up by the crops or evaporated into the atmosphere.  While this may be what happens with most of the irrigated water, there is evidence that a significant amount winds up in our waterways.

Sonoma County Gazette, July, 2013: Low Flow on the River

Summer is here, along with ‘low flow’ debate….At a special meeting on June 6th, as part of the Sweetwater Springs Water District regular Board Meeting, Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) staff described current river conditions, why low flows were necessary, and how low they may go.

Simultaneously, Santa Rosa has been revving up it’s “Take it from the Tap” promotional campaign, a State wide effort to get people to buy more municipal water, rather than the ever popular bottled.  While the merits of bottled water are often no more than convenience, encouraging customers to drink more tap (Russian River) water when flows are stressed, is dubious as well.  Conservation should be the theme of the day, not encouragement to use more tap water.

May 2013, Newsletter: Estuary, Fees, and Recycled water

Spring is here; temperatures have warmed; the river area is spectacular, and we are raring to go.  There is so much to tell you in a limited space; we won’t waste any time!

Estuary Project Update…….

As promised in RRWPC’s legal settlement with Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), an annual community meeting will be held on Thursday, May 16th at the Monte Rio Community Center (adjacent to paved beach parking lot) from 6 pm to 8:30 pm, to update citizens on the project’s progress. Please try to attend and also pass the word to neighbors and friends about the meeting.  The agenda will include information on fish counts, water quality and jetty studies, harbor seal monitoring and summer project plans.  Unfortunately, SCWA does not plan to discuss ‘low flow’, in spite of our request.

Please email Grant Davis, general manager of SCWA Grant.Davis@SCWA.ca.gov, and Fifth District Supervisor Efren Carrillo, (also SCWA Board of Director member)  Efren.Carrillo@sonoma-county.org  asking them to please include an update on the Temporary Urgency Change Petition (i.e., low flow) as part of the agenda.  This summer flows may decrease 45% down to 70 cubic feet per second (cfs)  from the 125 cfs normally maintained.  RRWPC is concerned that they have refused to discuss this item, even though low flow is required by the Biological Opinion.  Please send emails expressing your concern, and also raise this issue during public comment.

RRCSD fees set to increase next year; Meeting May 21st….

thumbnail

Russian River Summer Contractor Use: 2008 – 2012

The chart belowindicates Sonoma County Water Agency’s contractor water purchases from Russian River over the months of June through September for five years (2008-2012). Numbers represent acre ...

Newsletter, February 2013: Santa Rosa Discharge plans; Estuary update; Recycled Water

Dear RRWPC Supporter:

Many changes have been occurring lately in the Russian River environmental scene.  There is a great deal to report, so here we go.

City of Santa Rosa’s current programs & activities…..

  • The North Coast Regional Board released Santa Rosa’s draft wastewater discharge permit a few months ago; it is normally reviewed every five years and was last completed in 2006.  The permit regulates discharge of treated wastewater into Laguna tributaries between Oct. 1st and May 15th.  It also includes a Reclamation Permit that regulates wastewater irrigation practices.

RRWPC submitted a ten page letter expressing concerns regarding the summer irrigation program.  The Board will consider approval of the two permits on March 14th at their regular board meeting in Santa Rosa. (call Regional Board at 576-2220 for more information)  RRWPC comments and link to draft permit is at www.rrwpc.org

  • Salt and Nutrient Plans and Nutrient Offset Proposals are in the works behind the scenes.  RRWPC submitted comments on an early draft of the Plan a few months ago but have not seen reply as yet.  Santa Rosa hired consultants to develop a plan that is required by the State’s Recycled Water Policy.  The main concern is accumulation of salts and nutrients in groundwater.   (We are just as concerned about surface water.)